home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- <text id=93TT1762>
- <title>
- May 24, 1993: The Political Interest
- </title>
- <history>
- TIME--The Weekly Newsmagazine--1993
- May 24, 1993 Kids, Sex & Values
- </history>
- <article>
- <source>Time Magazine</source>
- <hdr>
- The Political Interest, Page 51
- Drawing a Line in the Quicksand
- </hdr>
- <body>
- <p>By Michael Kramer
- </p>
- <p> Montezuma! Tripoli! Macedonia! Macedonia? Yes, the former Yugoslav
- republic, unthreatened and at peace with its neighbors, may
- nonetheless be sent U.S. troops, thus saving it from a hypothetical
- Serbian aggression and allowing Bill Clinton to draw a line
- in the quicksand. Even the Macedonians are laughing. "Why here?"
- Macedonian Defense Minister Vlade Popovski told reporters. Because
- "we want to try to confine the conflict [in Bosnia] so it
- doesn't spread to other countries," the President said last
- week, ignoring the fact that Macedonia hasn't requested U.S.
- assistance.
- </p>
- <p> What's going on here? "It's called face-saving," says a Clinton
- adviser dismissively. "It's a way to look like we're doing something
- so maybe our incompetent Bosnia policy won't be noticed." Incompetent?
- "Yes," insists this adviser. "We're long on huffing and puffing.
- We're great at raising the stakes and talking about how what's
- happening in Bosnia is the most awful thing since the Holocaust.
- But then when it's time to make a real commitment of blood and
- treasure, it turns out we're ready to spend all of 2 cents on
- it. So this week the President talks about protecting Macedonia
- and he supports a U.N. border patrol to monitor Serbia's promise
- to cut off supplies to their Bosnian Serb brothers, which we
- already know is bogus, since fuel trucks have been passing the
- checkpoints without trouble. Next week after a few more editorials
- slam us for diddling around, we'll probably hear about the possibility
- of some other stunt. It's all a joke--and particularly Macedonia.
- I mean, a bunch of troops go over there to get better seats
- to watch the slaughter next door. Come on. You call that standing
- up to genocide?" No, but it may be a way for Clinton to climb
- down from a policy he seems increasingly to view as a no-win
- proposition.
- </p>
- <p> Whatever happened to the "tough," concerted allied action Clinton
- predicted was just around the corner? The allies have said,
- "No way" (or at least, "Not now"), and Clinton has blinked.
- The recriminations are flying, as they do when any policy unravels.
- Last week the White House said its preference for air strikes
- against the Serbs so the Bosnian Muslims can acquire the means
- to defend themselves was "on hold." The allies, Washington said,
- wouldn't consider the U.S. option until after the Bosnians voted
- on the U.N.-sponsored peace plan. "That's absurd," said Danish
- Foreign Minister Niels Petersen angrily. "The question of tying
- anything in the European Community's position to the referendum
- [didn't even come up in] our discussions" with Secretary of
- State Warren Christopher. "The real problem," says a White House
- aide, "is that Christopher couldn't sell the Europeans on our
- position." "Nonsense," says a State Department official. "Only
- the President could close the sale, and he refused. He could
- have gottev the Euros on board. He could have said, `We're going
- ahead, and you guys will look like wimps if you don't jump,'
- but he didn't. He himself said [in an interview with the Washington
- Post last Thursday] that a stronger U.S. stance `might' cause
- the allies to cut their carping and act. The only fair reading
- of a comment like that is that the President hasn't tried because
- he doesn't want to." Further proof of this assessment came last
- week when Bosnian Foreign Minister Haris Silajdzic couldn't
- even arrange a meeting with senior U.S. officials to discuss
- the situation Clinton once called "the nation's most urgent
- foreign policy priority." Explained a top American diplomat:
- "We can't see him because that would raise expectations our
- policy can't meet."
- </p>
- <p> The whole truth may never be known, but more than a few Administration
- officials blame the top dog. What's happened seems simple: Clinton
- believes his political fate won't hinge on Bosnia--unless
- he forces a military confrontation that could lead to the introduction
- of ground troops, an escalation that could quickly produce TV
- pictures of dead Americans rather than dead Bosnians. "If we
- go in and things go bad," concedes a Clinton aide, "then everything
- at home will stop as the world watches a messy ground war. Besides,
- we may get lucky. The Serbs may conclude they've grabbed enough
- territory and stop their killing, in which case no one's going
- to fight to roll back their land grab. The point is we're trying
- to keep our eye on the ball"--and America's eyes off Bosnia.
- "I'd like to go on [to] something else," the President said
- last week. "I wish I didn't have to spend [so] much time on
- it." Look, says an Administration political aide, "the ball
- game for us is the economy, period. Unless we get the deficit
- down and health reform on track, we'll be out of here in '96,
- which is not our intention. There's one more election, and we
- mean to win it." A harsh but realistic verdict--and one that
- will hold unless Clinton changes his mind again, a course of
- conduct with which this particular President is not exactly
- unfamiliar.
- </p>
-
- </body>
- </article>
- </text>
-
-